The recent firing of former FBI Director James Comey has put many Democrats on notice. Now, the lawyers for another former top official in the Obama administration are seeking immunity for their client.
Susan Rice, the former National Security Advisor to Obama, is now seeking a way to testify without facing the music herself. Rice’s lawyers have approached the FBI with the idea that Rice, who stands accused of ordering illegal wiretaps on journalists and President Donald Trump, with spill the beans so long as she’s free from a major criminal investigation, via Infowars.
Ever since the scandal has come to light, Rice has tried to avoid the glare of the interrogator’s light. For instance, she refused to testify before the Senate during their investigation into the Russian hacking conspiracy, via CNN.
On other counts, Rice has attempted to clear her own name by giving supposedly candid interviews to “serious” journalists.
In each interview, the fact that Rice is a compulsive liar comes through time and time again, via FOX News.
Rice has a reason to be evasive. The House is currently looking into whether or not Rice ordered the NSA to spy on Donald Trump and his team before the inauguration. According to some evidence, all of this was done with foreign intelligence services as cover, via Washington Times.
If convicted, Rice could face serious jail time. With immunity, she may name bigger names than herself.
Now, with Comey gone, the investigation into Rice and her cronies looks likely to continue. One of the major reasons why Rice is seeking immunity now is because without Comey, the FBI no longer serves the the interests of the Democratic Party.
Rice’s testimony could implicate people like Hillary Clinton, Loretta Lynch, or even Obama himself. From the emails that have been leaked by WikiLeaks, it is clear that former AG Lynch tried everything in her power to stop the investigation into Clinton from proceeding too far.
Similarly, the defeated Clinton campaign launched the Russian hacking theory a mere 24 hours after the final election results. This means that they may have been involved in espionage to find evidence for their claims, via Breitbart.
Should Susan Rice be prosecuted for her crimes? Let America know!